ISV IEEE Smart Village
← ISV Knowledge Base · Home

Metering & comms topology

ISV Technology Committee · 28 May 2026 · STS, OEM, DLMS, SMS token delivery, redundant field paths

← Back to Meeting Notes · Home

64%
Legacy hardware in operator fleets
3
Parallel protocol stacks (STS · OEM · DLMS)
None
STS reverse telemetry channel
Primary bottleneck

Handshakes and keys — DLMS, OEM, and STS each use different key hierarchies. DCU/NAN uplink fails often due to telecom topology (trees, walls, Cameroon rainy season), not meter hardware alone.

Communication topology — redundant channels
How to edit diagram

In diagrams.net: File → Import From → Device

Diagram failed to load.

Working path Frequent failure (DCU / NAN) Parallel NAN (RF mesh · PLC · repeater) SMS token delivery

Redundant communication channels

ChannelTypical techRole
SMS → phoneGSM / LTE SMSSTS token delivery — wide area, no meter feedback
Phone ↔ meterBLE, NFC, proprietary RFToken entry + meter query (CIU-equivalent); app must be certified
CIU ↔ meterProprietary RF / BluetoothLegacy 20-digit token entry; local stats (remaining energy)
Meter ↔ NANRF mesh, PLC (parallel)Neighborhood AMI — trees/walls/rain block LOS
DCU → cloudGPRS / 3G / 4G LTEPrimary WAN uplink — frequent bottleneck
Phone → cloudLTE dataProposed — relay when DCU path down
RepeatersRF relay nodes, phone-as-relaySupplement deployed mesh — not a replacement

Protocol stacks

StackKeysTwo-way?
STSSTS keys (≠ OEM, ≠ DLMS)No — no per-meter consumption feedback
OEMOEM keys; proprietary CIU languageVaries; edge self-registration
DLMS/COSEMDLMS keys; MacFi tunnel over proprietaryYes in principle

Field notes

Action items (tracked)

Full list at the top of this page and in Knowledge Base · Tasks. Comment and update status on GitHub Issues ↗.

Related