ISV Technology Committee · 28 May 2026 · STS, OEM, DLMS, SMS token delivery, redundant field paths
← Back to Meeting Notes · Home
Handshakes and keys — DLMS, OEM, and STS each use different key hierarchies. DCU/NAN uplink fails often due to telecom topology (trees, walls, Cameroon rainy season), not meter hardware alone.
In diagrams.net: File → Import From → Device
| Channel | Typical tech | Role |
|---|---|---|
| SMS → phone | GSM / LTE SMS | STS token delivery — wide area, no meter feedback |
| Phone ↔ meter | BLE, NFC, proprietary RF | Token entry + meter query (CIU-equivalent); app must be certified |
| CIU ↔ meter | Proprietary RF / Bluetooth | Legacy 20-digit token entry; local stats (remaining energy) |
| Meter ↔ NAN | RF mesh, PLC (parallel) | Neighborhood AMI — trees/walls/rain block LOS |
| DCU → cloud | GPRS / 3G / 4G LTE | Primary WAN uplink — frequent bottleneck |
| Phone → cloud | LTE data | Proposed — relay when DCU path down |
| Repeaters | RF relay nodes, phone-as-relay | Supplement deployed mesh — not a replacement |
| Stack | Keys | Two-way? |
|---|---|---|
| STS | STS keys (≠ OEM, ≠ DLMS) | No — no per-meter consumption feedback |
| OEM | OEM keys; proprietary CIU language | Varies; edge self-registration |
| DLMS/COSEM | DLMS keys; MacFi tunnel over proprietary | Yes in principle |
Full list at the top of this page and in Knowledge Base · Tasks. Comment and update status on GitHub Issues ↗.